University of Washington
North Atlantic PALACE Floats

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Automatic data processing & web-page generation
  3. Deployment locations for the Atlantic PALACE floats
  4. Deployments from Voluntary Observing Ships (VOS)
  5. Reliability Statistics
  6. Argos Data Telemetry
  7. Sea-Bird CTD module
  8. GTS publication of float profiles
  9. Contact Information
Return to Root Page


Introduction

Welcome to the Web Site for the 18-Degree Water study at the University of Washington.

This project, sponsored by the US National Science Foundation, is designed to examine the formation and circulation of the so-called "18-degree water" of the North Atlantic, using the technique of profiling ALACE (PALACE) floats. Components for these instruments are purchased from Webb Research, Inc., of Falmouth, MA, USA, and final assembly, calibration, and ballasting operations are carried out at the University of Washington in Seattle. In all, approximately 72 PALACEs have been deployed as part of this project. Other NSF-sponsored projects in the N. Atlantic using PALACE floats are also underway, in both the subarctic gyre and in the subtropical gyre, under the direction of scientists from other institutions, including Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, the University of Miami, and the NOAA/AOML Laboratory. All of these projects are part of the Atlantic Climate Change Experiment (ACCE), a 5-year program sponsored by NSF to examine ocean-atmosphere interaction in the N. Atlantic region and the ocean's effect on climate change.

Our goal here is to provide nearly real-time information on PALACE floats that have been launched in the 18° C water region (20°-40° N, 40°-80° W). Trajectories and profiles appear here as soon the data are received from the Argos system, normally within a day of data collection. Using this web page it is possible to view individual trajectories and temperature profiles along those trajectories, and to see a spaghetti plot of all trajectories. In addition, by clicking a mouse in any figure, it is possible to download a postscript file of the figure. As time goes on, new features will be added.

The first PALACEs were launched in July and August of 1997 from the R/V Knorr. Beginning in November of 1997, most floats were deployed from Voluntary Observing Ships (VOS). Between November, 1997 and March, 1998 a total of 43 VOS deployments of PALACE floats were successfully executed.

Automatic data processing, data distribution, & web-pages generation

This web site contains several thousand dynamic objects that must be updated as new data become available. Examples include postscript files, jpeg images, tables, HTML files, hydrographic profile data, and data distribution services. These objects are automatically generated or maintained in quasi-real-time by an extensible system of autonomous software. Consequently, maintaining this web site requires no regular manual intervention.

Reliability Statistics

The reliability of the buoyancy engine can be measured in terms of the number of profiles expected during a specified time period as compared to the number actually executed. The hydrographic data are not used to qualify or disqualify profiles and therefore these statistics are properly interpreted as measuring the reliability of the buoyancy engine as an elevator. However, the buoyancy engine does depend on the sensor module for pressure data in order to function properly.

Heterogeneous Reliability Statistics

The following table (updated daily) tabulates the number of profiles expected from the ensemble of Atlantic floats versus the number executed since deployment. Each Atlantic float was expected to serve a two-year mission after deployment but many continue to function well past their two-year mission has expired. The phrase Heterogeneous Reliability Statistics refers to the inclusion of all floats without regard to how long each has been in the field. Newly deployed floats are included and even the floats that have completed their two-year missions are counted as if they are still expected to continue to profile.

Profiling Drifter Reliability
Profiler Reliability Statistics
for the period from Jul 01 12:01 GMT 1997 to Aug 16 11:09 GMT 2004.
Group Size Profiles Executed Profiles Expected Reliability (%)
APEX180 10 659 1019 64.7
APF2 61 5515 6222 88.6
APF3 4 288 408 70.6
APF5 8 489 815 60.0
R1 63 5633 6426 87.7
SBE41 CTD 11 687 1121 61.3
Total 73 6292 7445 84.5

The R1 PALACE Float: The R1 model of PALACE has reached a mature phase of the development cycle and has proven its reliability. A total of 41 of the R1 floats in the table were deployed using the VOS method. The remaining 22 R1 floats were deployed from research vessels. The R1 model of PALACE is manufactured by Webb Research Corporation (WRC).

The APEX Float: The APEX is a newer model of profiling float that has been tested in the subtropical North Atlantic since 1997. Seven Atlantic VOS deployments of APEX instruments equipped with Sea-Bird CTD modules were conducted between September, 1998 and February, 1999. These trials were designed to test the APEX in preparation for the Japan/East Sea experiment. The APEX is also manufactured by WRC.

Homogeneous Reliability Statistics

For purposes here, the phrase Homogeneous Reliability Statistics indicates that the statistics are based on an ensemble of floats that share two characteristics: These statistics were computed in order to answer the question: "What reliability can be expected for missions lasting N years?"

Reliability for One-Year Deployments: The table below (updated daily) tabulates one-year statistics for the subset of floats that have been in the field for at least one year.

Profiling Drifter Reliability
Profiler Reliability Statistics
for the period from Jul 01 12:01 GMT 1997 to Aug 16 11:10 GMT 2004.
Group Size Profiles Executed Profiles Expected Reliability (%)
APEX180 10 310 334 92.8
APF2 61 1990 2074 95.9
APF3 4 102 132 77.3
APF5 8 252 266 94.7
R1 63 2034 2138 95.1
SBE41 CTD 11 320 365 87.7
Total 73 2344 2472 94.8

Reliability for Two-Year Deployments: The table below (updated daily) tabulates two-year statistics for the subset of floats that have been in the field for at least two years.

Profiling Drifter Reliability
Profiler Reliability Statistics
for the period from Jul 01 12:01 GMT 1997 to Aug 16 11:11 GMT 2004.
Group Size Profiles Executed Profiles Expected Reliability (%)
APEX180 8 390 543 71.8
APF2 59 3732 4012 93.0
APF3 4 191 272 70.2
APF5 8 390 543 71.8
R1 63 3923 4284 91.6
SBE41 CTD 11 525 747 70.3
Total 71 4313 4827 89.4

Reliability for Three-Year Deployments: The table below (updated daily) tabulates three-year statistics for the subset of floats that have been in the field for at least three years.

Profiling Drifter Reliability
Profiler Reliability Statistics
for the period from Jul 01 12:01 GMT 1997 to Aug 16 11:11 GMT 2004.
Group Size Profiles Executed Profiles Expected Reliability (%)
APEX180 8 489 815 60.0
APF2 59 5345 6018 88.8
APF3 4 288 408 70.6
APF5 8 489 815 60.0
R1 63 5633 6426 87.7
SBE41 CTD 11 687 1121 61.3
Total 71 6122 7241 84.5

Reliability for Four-Year Deployments: The table below (updated daily) tabulates four-year statistics for the subset of floats that have been in the field for at least four years.

Profiling Drifter Reliability
Profiler Reliability Statistics
for the period from Jul 01 12:01 GMT 1997 to Aug 16 11:11 GMT 2004.
Group Size Profiles Executed Profiles Expected Reliability (%)
APEX180 8 532 1089 48.9
APF2 59 6556 8083 81.1
APF3 3 198 408 48.5
APF5 8 532 1089 48.9
R1 62 6754 8491 79.5
SBE41 CTD 11 730 1497 48.8
Total 70 7286 9580 76.1

Argos Data Telemetry

The data are recovered from the floats via the Argos system. Most of our floats spend 11.5 to 15 hours transmitting on the surface with one message transmitted each 84 to 96 seconds. This means that the floats transmit from 430 to 645 messages for each profile. Most of these transmissions are lost because no satellite happens to be overhead. In fact, telemetry statistics below show that only 7 to 10 percent of these messages are transmitted when a satellite is overhead. We are experimenting with various factors that affect data telemetry and evaluate the results using many different types of statistics. Some statistics have wider appeal and we have collected several of them in the table below (updated daily). All of these statistics were computed on a per-profile basis.

University of Washington Profiling Drifter ARGOS Receipt Statistics
As of 11:14 GMT on Aug 16, 2004 Average Per-Profile Statistics for ARGOS Data Telemetry
Float
Id
Profiles
Executed
Incomplete
Profiles
Satellite
Passes
Telemetric
Efficiency
Messages
Expected
Messages
Received
Messages
Missing
Good
Messages
Bad
Messages
001 133 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
002 57 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
003 113 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
004 143 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
010 70 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
011 152 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
013 190 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
014 45 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
016 235 4 1.7% 7 69% 50 43 87% 7 13% 34 80% 9 20%
017 76 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
018 227 1 0.4% 6 69% 48 42 87% 7 13% 33 79% 8 21%
019 240 6 2.5% 7 69% 49 43 87% 6 13% 34 79% 9 21%
020 231 3 1.3% 6 69% 43 37 89% 6 11% 30 78% 7 22%
021 76 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
022 106 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
023 169 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
024 201 1 0.5% 7 73% 45 40 89% 5 11% 33 83% 7 17%
026 193 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
027 192 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
028 37 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
063 92 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
079 169 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
080 218 0 0.0% 7 68% 50 43 85% 8 15% 34 80% 9 20%
081 120 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
082 176 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
084 139 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
085 100 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
086 138 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
087 92 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
088 76 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
089 99 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
090 146 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
091 42 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
092 127 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
093 153 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
094 139 0 0.0% 18 23% 34 34 100% 0 0% 8 23% 26 77%
095 65 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
096 166 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
097 201 3 1.5% 7 68% 48 41 86% 7 14% 32 79% 8 21%
098 85 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
099 166 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
104 208 7 3.4% 6 69% 44 37 86% 6 14% 30 80% 7 20%
105 167 0 0.0% 17 66% 105 90 85% 15 15% 69 77% 21 23%
106 168 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
107 154 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
108 191 6 3.1% 7 66% 46 39 85% 7 15% 30 77% 9 23%
109 157 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
110 138 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
111 100 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
112 160 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
113 141 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
114 66 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
115 201 10 5.0% 6 66% 47 40 85% 7 15% 31 78% 9 22%
116 199 0 0.0% 6 71% 48 41 86% 7 14% 34 82% 7 18%
117 171 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
118 64 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
119 59 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
120 191 6 3.1% 6 67% 42 36 86% 6 14% 28 78% 8 22%
121 111 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
122 213 5 2.3% 7 68% 51 42 85% 9 15% 33 79% 9 21%
125 100 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
126 100 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
186 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
191 34 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
193 43 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
215 57 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
216 42 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
220 118 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
221 100 0 0.0% 0 0% 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
228 129 16 12.4% 9 68% 69 58 84% 11 16% 46 80% 11 20%
Ensemble Average: 0.5% 7 68% 48 41 86% 7 14% 33 79% 8 21%
Standard Deviation: 1.7% 2 11% 17 12 7% 10 7% 11 10% 5 10%

Publication of Profiles to the Global Telecommunications System (GTS)

The profiles from these floats are published in quasi-real-time via the GTS system using TESAC/KKXX format. Each float is assigned a unique WMO identifer that can be found on our Present Status web page. The status of each profile with respect to GTS publication is also available on our GTS Status web page.

Quality control of profile data is managed automatically by a QC module that is integrated into the GTS publication software. Each profile must pass a number of quality control criteria in order to be published via GTS. If even a single observation in the profile violates any of the criteria then publication of the entire profile is inhibited. For the Atlantic Ocean, the following criteria are used to inhibit publication of rejected profiles.

  1. A profile that is older than 30 days will be rejected as required for GTS publication.

  2. A profile that does not have a valid location fix will be rejected as required for GTS publication. This might happen if ARGOS reception is poor.

  3. A profile with a gap between adjacent observations that exceeds 300 decibars will be rejected. A profile with the shallowest observation deeper than 300 decibars will also be rejected. This is to maintain reasonable accuracy in the pressure to depth conversion calculation as required for GTS publication. This might happen if ARGOS reception is poor.

  4. A profile with an observation where the pressure is reported to be less than zero or greater than 3000 decibars will be rejected as indicative of a pressure sensor problem or malfunction.

  5. A profile with deepest observation less than 50 decibars is rejected. For example, this might happen if the float drifts into shallow water or becomes entangled in mats of surface-drifting seaweed.

  6. A profile with pressures that are not monotonic will be rejected. This is intended as a general criterion that a properly collected profile should satisfy.

  7. A profile with fewer than 5 observations will be rejected. This is intended as a general criterion that a properly collected profile should satisfy.
This list is exhaustive in the sense that any profiles that do not violate these criteria will be published via GTS. In the absence of established GTS quality control criteria, we have taken the approach of caveat emptor with respect to the hydrographic data. We note, however, that the data returned by the floats appear to be of high quality. This assertion has been quantitatively demonstrated in the case of floats equipped with Sea-Bird CTD modules. For the T-only floats, we are investigating ways to quantitatively assess the accuracy and drift of the pressure and temperature sensors. One R1 float was recovered after profiling normally for 14 months in the Atlantic Ocean and the temperature and pressure sensors were recalibrated. The RMS difference between the initial and final calibration curves was 46 millidegrees and 2 decibars. This result is better than we expected and supports the notion that the magnitude of the drift is much less than the signals that we are seeking to measure.


Contact Information: Please note that none of the material on this web site should be quoted or published without the permission of the principal investigator. Questions concerning the information available here can be addressed to the principal investigator of this project, Professor Stephen C. Riser, School of Oceanography, Box 357940, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 USA, riser@ocean.washington.edu.

This web site was developed and is maintained by Dana Swift (email: swift@ocean.washington.edu).


Root Page

Vistior Number: